Legal Opinion

Dolan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 12, 1991No. 90-174Published

1Per curiam

Terrence Dolan appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine and resisting arrest without violence. As to defendant’s first point on appeal, we conclude that the codefendant’s testimony cannot reasonably be construed as an impermissible reference to a polygraph examination. Second, no reversible error has been shown with respect to the trial court’s ruling regarding *812the two television programs which aired during the course of the trial. See Alfonso v. State, 443 So.2d 176, 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The programs did not relate to the instant case, no request was made to poll the jury, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. David Ivan Goodman, A/K/A Charles Riccardi and David Lash, and Paul AlexanderwestCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Alfonso v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API