Legal Opinion

Heinz Pulvermann v. The A. S. Abell Co., Lawrence Westbrook v. The A. S. Abell Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1956No. 18-1689PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Chief Judge.

These are appeals from summary judgments for defendant, the publisher of a newspaper, in actions to recover damages for alleged libel in the publication of a newspaper article. After motions to dismiss the complaints in the two actions had been denied and answers had been filed pleading privilege, fair comment and lack of malice, the facts surrounding the publication of the article were established by failure to deny requests for admission and affidavits were filed showing lack of express malice on the part of the managing editor and his assistant responsible for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Negley v. FarrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Gandia v. PettingillSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Snyder v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  4. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  5. Pulvermann v. AS Abell CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. HelinskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Abram v. OdhamSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Hackworth v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Ass'n v. BreslerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Seymour v. A.S. Abell Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API