Legal Opinion

Calvin E. Chandler v. Government Employees Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1965No. 21501_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Under the Florida statute, F.S.A. § 627.0851(1), the appellee Insurance Company was required to include a provision in its policy to the appellant insuring him or his legal representatives up to the limits of $10,000 and $20,000 as to all sums which the insured or his legal representative shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile. Insured’s policy also, however, contained an “other insurance” clause, which, if applicable here, would make the coverage unavailable to the appellant because at the time of the injury brought about by the…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Moore v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. SiddonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HoweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  5. Baxter v. Royal Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API