Moskowitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Chief Judge.
In a dispute arising from an automobile accident, the trial court entered summary judgment against the plaintiff, Mitchell Mos-kowitz, on the ground that he improperly settled with the tortfeasor before giving written notice, as is required .by section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (1993), to his insurance company, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company. The effect of the summary judgment precludes Moskowitz from pursuing an uninsured motorist action against State Farm. We reverse because of genuine issues of material fact.
It is undisputed that Moskowitz did not provide the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bankers Ins. Co. v. MacIasSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Rafferty v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Kovarnik v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gray v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Yablon v. North River Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Gay v. Association Casualty Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012