Legal Opinion

American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 15, 1943No. 8046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.

The issues relate to the amount and disposition of the benefits of a revived policy of war risk yearly renewable term insurance, issued originally in 1918 to Alcee Peter Seldon, pursuant to the War Risk Insurance Act of October 6, 1917.1 The claimants are the guardian of the insured’s minor children, the administrator of his estate, the administrator of his widow’s estate, and his sister, Eulalie Gougis, who was the named beneficiary. The District Court rendered judgment for the guardian, denying the other claims, for the aggregate sum of the monthly instalments…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Singleton v. CheekSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Dowell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  5. Heinemann v. HeinemannCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HenningSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. HenningSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API