Legal Opinion
Metz v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 3, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of responent Division of Housing and Community Renewal of the State of New York, issued June 17, 1982, that petitioner had willfully overcharged a tenant and directed petitioner to pay to the tenant a penalty equal to three times the overcharge.
Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs to respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal of the State of New York.
In an order and determination issued on November 21, 1980, respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal of the State of New…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Tockwotten Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- East 163rd Street LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Century Tower Associates v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Matter of EAST 163rd St. LLC v. N. Y. State Div. of Hous. & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court, Bronx County · 2004
- Sakraf Properties, Inc. v. EimickeNew York Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.