Legal Opinion

Booraem v. Merrifield

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1841PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from tie commercial court of Mew Orleans. [595] This is an action against tie defendant as one of tie makers of a promissory note, payable at tie branch of tie Planters’ Bank at Port Gibson, Mississippi. There was a general denial pleaded. A hill of exception was taken to tie admission of testimonial proof, or parol evidence of tie laws of Mississippi, in relation to demand of notes at the place where made payable, in order to recover against tie maker.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tie commercial court of Mew Orleans. [595] This is an action against tie defendant as one of tie makers of a promissory note, payable at tie branch of tie Planters’ Bank at Port Gibson, Mississippi. There was a general denial pleaded. A hill of exception was taken to tie admission of testimonial proof, or parol evidence of tie laws of Mississippi, in relation to demand of notes at the place where made payable, in order to recover against tie maker. The proof was offered to show that this was not necessary in Mississippi. Tie plaintiff had judgment, and tie defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMoephy, J.

delivered tie opinion of the court.

This suit is brought on a promissory note of defendant, payable to tie order of tie plaintiffs, drawn in tie State of Mississippi, and made payable at tie branch of tie Planters’ Bank at Port Gibson. The general issue was pleaded. On tie trial a witness was offered to prove that by tie laws of Mississippi, where tie note was made payailo, it is not necessary to present it for payment at tie place designated therein, in order to maintain *359an action against the drawer. This testimony was objected to on the ground that the laws of a State cannot be proved by…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Waring v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API