Legal Opinion

Toulouse v. New York Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1952No. 31771Published

1Opinion of the Court

40 Wn.2d 538 (1952)

245 P.2d 205

GEORGE J. TOULOUSE, JR., as Executor, Appellant,

v.

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.[1]

No. 31771.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc..

May 29, 1952.

George J. Toulouse, Jr., and Clarence A. Lirhus, for appellant.

Catlett, Hartman, Jarvis & Williams, for respondent.

HILL, J.

This appeal presents a challenge to the validity of an agreement between an insurer and an insured, where the insured, exercising one of the optional methods of settlement offered by an endowment policy on maturity of the policy, elected to leave the proceeds of the policy with the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Decker v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Stevenson v. EarlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  4. State Ex Rel. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  5. Cook v. LumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API