Legal Opinion

Groeger v. Col-Les Orthopedic Associates, P. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 14, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In this medical malpractice action, the moving defendants submitted the affidavit of a medical expert who concluded, based upon examination of the pleadings, hospital records and pathological slides, that the pathologic examination performed by defendant Dr. Hertzog- was within accepted medical standards and that Dr. Hertzog’s inability to determine whether a schwannoma was benign or malignant did not constitute a deviation from accepted medical practice. This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Fileccia v. Massapequa General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Fileccia v. Massapequa General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Maust v. ArseneauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Sheehan Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Doyle v. Health Care Plan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API