Legal Opinion

Friedsam v. State Tax Commission

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1984PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jasen, J.

We are asked to decide whether the determination of the State Tax Commission denying nonresident taxpayer an income tax deduction to which a resident taxpayer is entitled for payment of alimony conforms with the State’s tax policy (Tax Law, § 632, subd [a], par [1]; § 635, subd [c], par [1]).

During the tax year 1979, petitioner, Lance Friedsam, was a resident of Connecticut and employed by the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) in White Plains, New York. Petitioner’s total compensation from IBM was $61,750, of which $52,710 was considered to be…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals TribunalSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. McNulty v. New York State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Michaelsen v. New York State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Lunding v. Tax Appeals TribunalNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Hunt v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API