State v. Swyningan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted of unlawful distribution of heroin after a trial before the district court sitting without a jury. Minn. St. 152.09, subd. 1; § 152.02, subd. 2(2). Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, and'we affirm.
Two issues are presented on this appeal. Was defendant’s conviction based on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice and thus unlawful under § 634.04? Did a comment made by the prosecutor prevent a key defense witness from testifying, thus denying defendant the right to present evidence in his own defense?
Defendant was convicted of distributing heroin to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State v. MatousekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Commonwealth v. JenningsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. PietraszewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.