Legal Opinion

Cook Inlet Tribal Council v. Mandregan

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 7, 2018No. Case No. 14-cv-1835 (EGS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge

I. Introduction

Over twenty-five years ago, the Cook Inlet Tribal Council ("CITC") and the Indian Health Service ("IHS") entered into a self-determination contract pursuant to the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act ("ISDEAA"). Under this contract, CITC has operated substance abuse programs serving Alaskan Native patients, while IHS provides federal funding to CITC, allowing CITC to administer federal programs and services that IHS would have otherwise provided. In 2014, CITC proposed a contract amendment for additional…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  4. Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cook Inlet Tribal Council, Inc. v. Christopher MandreganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  2. Cook Inlet Tribal Council, Inc. v. MandreganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  3. Feroz v. Commex CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  4. Jerome's Furniture Warehouse v. Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API