Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Forg

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2002No. 2002-1463PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In this case, we sanction an attorney who seriously neglected a client’s case, used her client’s funds as her own, did not communicate with her client, and failed to return the client’s case file or funds on request. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline found that respondent, E. Farran Forg, also known as Elizabeth Farran Forg, of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0061123, committed these acts and thereby violated DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); DR 6-101(A)(3) (neglecting an entrusted legal…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. ForgOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API