Larry R. Hedlund v. State of Iowa
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
APPEL, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I. Introduction.
I concur in part and dissent in part. I concur in the majority's conclusion that a whistleblower claim is available to Hedlund under Walsh v. Wahlert , 913 N.W.2d 517 (Iowa 2018). I also concur that the district court properly dismissed Hedlund's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim.
I write on two issues. First, I dissent from the affirmance of summary judgment on Hedlund's civil rights claim. Second, I agree with the majority's result on the remedial questions regarding Iowa Code section 70A.28(5)(a )…
2Cases cited139 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.