Legal Opinion

Harris v. Franklin-Williamson Human Services, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided May 11, 2000No. CIV. A. 98-4290-DRHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HERNDON, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Pending before the Court are Defendants’ three motions for summary judgment and Defendants’ three motions for sanctions pursuant to Feberal Rule Of Civil Prooedure 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 against Marcia Harris and her attorneys (Docket Entry Nos. 88, 98, 105, 62, 120, and 124, respectively). As to the motions for summary judgment, Defendants maintain that they are entitled to summary judgment on all counts of Harris’ First Amended Complaint. Specifically, they maintain that Harris has not established a prima facie case under any of…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grako v. Bill Walsh Chevrolet-Cadillac Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023
  2. Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. Sharp Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. Accurso v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  4. Duffy v. Department of StateDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  5. Clark-Kutscher v. SSM Health Care CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API