Legal Opinion

Unicon Management Corp. v. Koppers Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 7, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERLANDS, District Judge:

This motion poses a question of adjective law: What procedure should be followed in resolving a preliminary issue of fact where the defendants’ challenge to personal jurisdiction is predicated on their assertion that they did not commit a tortious act within the State of New York?

In this case, the disputed factual issue — whether the defendants committed a tortious act within the State of New York — is not only determinative of the jurisdictional question raised by the motion at bar but also constitutes the ultimate question decisive of the litigation in chief.

We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. United States v. Montreal Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  3. People v. SwanbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Unicon Management Corp. v. Koppers CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. Upadhyay v. SethiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Weiner v. SorensonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
  4. Kregler v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. Kregler v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API