Legal Opinion

Gulf, M. & N. R. v. Hardy

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1924No. 24193PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellee sued the appellant for a personal injury. The declaration contained three counts: First, the failure to ring the bell and blow the whistle, etc., on approaching public crossings in the town of Philadelphia; second, for the operation of said train at a greater rate of speed than six miles an hour within the corporate limits of the town of Philadelphia; third, that on said occasion said train was being driven at a rapid rate of speed and in a northerly direction and in the direction of plaintiff’s team and defendant’s warehouse, where plaintiff was unloading feed from defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skipwith v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CrominarityMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. WeathersbyMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. LambuthMississippi Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gulf, M. N.R.R. Co. v. HardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API