Claim of Alterman v. A. I. Namm & Son
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, A. I. Namm & Son and another, from an award and order of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the New York office of said Commission on the 29th day of May, 1919.
1Opinion of the Court
Cochrane, J.:
The employer conducted a large department store which at the time of the accident on June 17, 1917, was a non*77hazardous occupation not covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. In its store on the seventh floor it had a carpenter shop in connection with its business and incidental thereto. It had in its regular and permanent employment five or six carpenters to do work in and about the store. The claimant was thus employed, as a carpenter in moving some partitions and on leaving his work for the day he was injured in an elevator in the building. His employment in the store had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Mulford v. A. S. Pettit & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Matter of Schmidt v. . BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Claim of Solomon v. BonisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Matter of Solomon v. . BonisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924