Legal Opinion

McGregor v. Cole

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Hillsdale. (Lane, J.) Argued April 4, 1894. Decided May 18, 1894. Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hooker. J.

Defendant, being in the employ of the plaintiff, got married, and, wishing to go to keeping-house, prevailed on the plaintiff ‘ to aid him in buying-some household goods, which he did by signing a note with him for $72, and paying for a stove $6, making $78 in all.. The defendant gave the plaintiff a chattel mortgage for the amount, which provided that, if the mortgagor should attempt to remove the goods, or any part of the same, from the house where he was living, without *263the written consent of the plaintiff, the plaintiff might take the same, and hold them until the mortgage…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gidday v. WitherspoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. O'GormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API