Legal Opinion

Connelly v. County of Dakota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Dakota county, Crosby, J., presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtG-ileillan, C. J.

Among the items in the bill charged by the plaintiff, as sheriff of his county, against the county, for services, were some for bringing prisoners into the district court for trial, arraignment, and sentence, and for attendance on them while in court, at terms when he was in attendance on the court, and some for washing for prisoners in his custody as sheriff. These items were disallowed by the district court, and the disallowance is alleged as error. The statute requires the sheriff to attend upon the terms of the district court, (Gen. St. 1878, c. 8, § 195;) and for *366this duty he is allowed…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Wagener v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API