West v. Village Ford-Mercury, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Ronnie and Dutchie West sued Village Ford-Mercury, Inc. (“Village Ford”) under a negligent entrustment theory for damages sustained in an automobile collision. Village Ford moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the dealership’s motion. The Wests appeal. Finding no error, we affirm.
On appeal, we review the trial court’s summary judgment ruling de novo and “construe the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to [the Wests] as the nonmovant [s].” Summary judgment is appropriate only if no genuine issue of material fact remains…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phillips v. MacDougaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Canal Insurance Co. v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Bank South, N.A. v. ZweigCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Hindmon v. Virgil's Food Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. National Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Lahaina Acquisitions, Inc. v. GCA Strategic Investment Fund Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003