Legal Opinion

Teat v. Westmoreland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 8, 1916No. 7447PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari; from Franklin superior court—Judge Worley. March 28, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

1. A running open account, the items of which have all matured at the time of the suit, can not be divided into separate parts for the purpose of bringing each part within the jurisdiction of a justice’s court, without the consent of the-defendant; but where such an account is divided into three parts, or rather where, at the request of the defendant and for his convenience (he wanting separate accounts kept of what . his son and two hands got), three separate accounts against him are kept on the books, and these accounts, amounting in the aggregate to more than one hundred dollars, are sued…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parris v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. McDonald v. TisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. EndsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Smith v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Smith v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Smith v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API