Legal Opinion

Jose F. v. Pat M.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William L. Underwood, Jr., J.

The case at bar presents the following question: May a man, voluntarily cohabitating with a woman falsely claiming to practice birth control, maintain a cause of action against the woman when she becomes pregnant and delivers a child?

Plaintiff asserts the following: Plaintiff and defendant met *884in 1985, and soon developed a romantic interest in each other. Between 1986 and 1988, this romantic interest manifested itself in sexual relations between the parties. Prior to their congress, however, defendant engaged in a canard. She told Mr. F. that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fischer v. MaloneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Jo Ann Homes at Bellmore, Inc. v. DworetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Halio v. LurieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. Weicker v. WeickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. L. Pamela P. v. Frank S.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanders v. RosenNew York Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API