Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Biddle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1980No. 398PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTS, Justice.

Since Tafel Estate, 449 Pa. 442, 296 A.2d 797 (1972), we have required that adopted children be presumptively included in a testamentary gift to “children” unless the testator’s intention to exclude adopted children is clearly indicated. Appellant, an adopted child, claims the right to participate in future income distributions from a testamentary trust established by his adoptive great-grandfather. The orphans’ court held that because appellant could have litigated his claim at a 1952 audit of an account of the estate but failed to do so, that appellant’s claim to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Tafel EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Kellerman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Estate of SykesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Brown EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hackley v. HackleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Cassidy v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Estate of DullesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. In Re Estate of OgdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Estate of RileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API