Legal Opinion

United States Marshals Service v. Means

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1983No. 82-2489PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

The significant question before us concerns the expenditure of federal funds for fees and expenses of witnesses subpoenaed by indigent civil litigants. The United States brought an action against some forty Sioux Indians and others (the appellees) living in the Yellow Thunder Camp, claiming that the lands were being illegally occupied. The district court1 found that the Government had brought a number of experts to testify, and that certain witnesses were necessary for appellees’ defense to obviate dismissal for non-prosecution. It ordered the United States…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Badman v. StarkDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. United States Marshals Service v. MeansCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Collins Spencer Catch the BearCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. MeansCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  5. Rivera v. DiSabatoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API