Legal Opinion

In re Parmer

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1936No. 9004Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This case is before the -court on exceptions to a report of the Conciíiation Com*1007missioner recommending the dismissal of debtor’s petition under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act as amended (11 U.S.C.A. § 203).

The petition for relief under section 75 was filed by Rhoda E. Beard Parmer, individually, and as a personal representative of John B. Parmer, her deceased husband.

The Conciliation Commissioner found as a fact that John B. Parmer, and after his death Rhoda E. Beard Parmer, conducted a business of stone crushing and' threshing, and concluded as a matter of. law that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brais v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
  2. In Re PlumerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1935
  3. In re CoxDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API