Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCallister v. State (In re Worker's Comp. Claim Of)

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2019No. S-18-0142Published

1DissentDavis, Chief Justice

[¶51] I must respectfully dissent. As the majority acknowledges, nineteen years ago this Court held that a district court may exercise jurisdiction over a petition for review in a worker's compensation case even if it is not one of the courts listed in Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 16-3-114(a). Moller v. State ex rel. Wyo. Workers' Safety & Comp. Div. , 12 P.3d 702, 704 (Wyo. 2000).

[¶52] The Moller decision does not, as the majority correctly asserts, contain in-depth analysis of district court jurisdiction over petitions of review. However, we have on a number of occasions held that when this Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Slb v. JeoWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Associated Governments of Northwest Colorado v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  3. Evelyn Difelici, f/n/a Evelyn Barnes v. City of LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Ball v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Kite v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API