Legal Opinion

Ruffner v. Love

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 28, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMoran, J.

This action was brought to recover against plaintiff in error for goods sold to the firm of Ruffner & Somes, on a guaranty alleged to have been made by plaintiff in error. The entire evidence in the case consisted of the deposition of defendant in error, and certain letters and a statement of accounts attached to said deposition as exhibits. The Ruffner who was a member of the firm of Ruffner & Somes, was a son of the plaintiff in error. Prior to the formation of said firm, plaintiff in error had been, it seems, carrying on a cigar business, and had been dealing with Love, the defendant in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Reynolds v. DouglassSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  4. Newman v. Streator Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  5. Powell v. Chicago Carpet CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Neagle v. SpragueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  2. Sears v. Swift & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  3. Hickox v. FelsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  4. Martin v. SparrowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. Meyer v. RuhstadtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API