Legal Opinion
Romeo v. Union Free School District No. 3
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn G. Me Carthy, J.
The petitioner was employed by the respondent school district as its Superintendent of Buildings and Grounds. He was a civil service employee, with permanent status in his position, and therefore entitled to all the rights under the Civil Service Law of the State and in particular those rights set forth in section 75 of such law.
That on or about December 9, 1974, respondent caused to be served upon petitioner a written notice of charges consisting of 13 counts of misconduct and 12 counts of incompetency and the reasons therefor. Admittedly, if found guilty of one, some or all of the specified…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Coplon v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- People v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- 125 Bar Corp. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Romeo v. Union Free School District, No. 3Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Martin v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Nunley v. GuidoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978