Legal Opinion

Trust Co. of Columbus v. Milam (In Re Milam)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided June 13, 1980No. 19-40078PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT

ALGIE M. MOSELEY, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The parties have submitted this for decision on stipulated facts, which are attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Court is to determine whether or not the Trust Company of Columbus is a secured creditor. The Trust Company of Columbus, hereinafter “plaintiff,” has a security interest in 401.52 shares of Fuqua Industries by reason of a security agreement between the debtor and the plaintiff. The question centers around whether or not plaintiff perfected its security interest. Herein, the Court finds that the security interest was not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heinicke Instruments Company, a Corporation v. Republic Corporation, a Corporation, and Samuel N. BergmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Huffman v. WikleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Van Kylen (In Re Van Kylen)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1989
  2. Hale v. Kontaratos (In Re Kontaratos)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1981
  3. GPA Corp. v. Air Florida, Inc. (In Re Air Florida System Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1985
  4. Levey v. Burke, Wilson & McIlvaine (In Re Bragiel)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API