Legal Opinion

Brimson v. Pearrow

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 13, 1950No. 4-9277PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Minor W. Millwee, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Ocie Dona Pearrow to set aside a deed executed by her to appellants, Dr. James E. Brimson and wife, on May 1, 1942, conveying lots 5 and 6, block 1, Reubel and Leymer’s Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. In the same suit Mrs. Pearrow also sought to cancel a deed between the same parties dated November 2, 1938, conveying lot 4 in the same block and addition, or, in the alternative, to recover the alleged unpaid purchase price of said lot.

The trial court found that the deed to lots 5 and 6 was void and same was ordered cancelled…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Salyers v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  2. Priest v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Edwards v. LockeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Whittaker v. TrammellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Pearrow v. VadenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duncan v. HensleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Hendrix v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Bryant v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API