Avenue Z Wet Wash Laundry Co. v. Yarmush
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCallaghan, J.
There are sufficient facts shown here to warrant the court in restraining the individual defendant who has gone into the service of the corporate defendant after leaving the service of the plaintiff, if there was a contractual relation existing between this plaintiff and the individual defendant.
It appears that in 1924 the defendant entered into a contract with the East End West Wash Laundry Co., Inc., whereby he was to solicit customers for the laundry company at a stipulated compensation. The territory in which he was to operate was specified in the contract and it provided that in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Paige v. . FaureNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Nassau Hotel Co. v. Barnett & Barse Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Hayes v. WillioNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1872
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Inland Rubber Corporation v. Triple a Tire Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Seligman & Latz, Inc. v. NoonanNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Safelite Glass Corp. v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
- Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.