Legal Opinion

United States v. Daugerdas

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 3, 2010No. S3 09 Cr. 581 (WHP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:

The Government moves to disqualify the law firm of Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal LLP (“Sonnenschein”) from representing Defendant Denis Field (“Field”) based on Sonnenschein’s simultaneous representation of cooperating witness Adrian Dicker (“Dicker”). For the following reasons, the Government’s motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

In the Third Superseding Indictment (the “Indictment”), Field is charged with participating in a tax fraud conspiracy from 1994 to 2005. Field is the former Chairman of BDO Seidman LLP (“BDO”), an accounting firm at…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Claddis Arrington, Brooks Gregory Davis, Mary Ferguson Davis, and Wayne DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Frank James and Wallace RiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Guillermo Aliro PerezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. BabyCenter, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Wayne BellilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API