Legal Opinion

Whitham v. Gellis

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 3, 1940No. 3202PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

While the decedent’s errand was not a part of his work, the finding that it was a natural incident of it is construed to mean that it was not a departure from it. Taking into account the nature of his errand which called for no time or distance amounting to an absence in breach of the terms of his employment, the conclusion is that the accident arose out of as well as in the course of the employment. It was his duty to be on hand, and it was while on duty and in connection with the duty that the accident occurred. While engaged in employment an employee’s conduct in matters of a personal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gallienne v. Becker Bros. Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  2. Snook v. PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Newell v. MoreauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  3. Bernier v. Greenville Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
  4. Martin v. Snuffy's Steak HouseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. New England Telephone Co. v. AmesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API