Baltes Land, Stone & Oil Co. v. Sutton
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Blackford Circuit Court; A. N. Martin, Special J udge. Action by James M. Sutton against the Baltes Land, Stone & Oil Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant company appeals. Decided by the court without written opinion, November 20, 1901.
1Opinion
*649On Petition eor Rehearing.
2Per curiam
Counsel for appellant have filed a brief in support of their petition for a rehearing in the case, in which they earnestly contend that the answer filed by appellant to the complaint of appellee Sutton, and the answer filed by appellant to the cross-complaint of the Spauldings are both sufficient as answers of former adjudication, and that the trial court erred in sustaining appellees’ demurrer to each of said answers.
The law upon which counsel base their argument is well stated in Kilander v. Hoover, 111 Ind. 10, where the court said: “If it appears that the first…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Kilander v. HooverIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Baltes Land, Stone & Oil Co. v. SuttonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
4Cited by1 opinion
- Baltes Land, Stone & Oil Co. v. SuttonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903