Betz v. City of Sioux City

(dissenting) — I have no quarrel with the majority opinion as to most of the general proposition made. It is not my understanding that the opinion holds that the irregularities in. procedure amount to reversible error, such as the violation by the court of Rule 118, making a general ruling instead of specifying the grounds upon which the ruling is based. Hull v. Bishop-Stoddard Cafeteria, 238 Iowa 650, 26 N. W. 2d 429; Humphrey v. City of Des Moines, 236 Iowa 800, 20 N. W. 2d 25; State v. Otterholt, 234 Iowa 1286, 15 N. W. 2d 529, in all of which this irregularity was discussed, have held…