Morgan v. Town of Orangetown
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1073The appeal from so much of the order dated August 25, 2008 as denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, but which was, in actuality, one for leave to reargue their motion pursuant to CPLR 901 and 902 for class action certification must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from the denial of leave to reargue (see Consolidated Resources, LLC v 210-220-230 Owner’s Corp., 59 AD3d 579, 580 [2009]).
The plaintiffs commenced this action to challenge two resolutions enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Orangetown (hereinafter the Town Board)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Consolidated Resources v. 210-220-230 Owner's Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by1 opinion
- Berger v. Prospect Park Residence, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018