Legal Opinion

In re Townsend

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1990No. 89-1730PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

We decide today that *137the term “absconds,” as used in R.C. 2951.07, can include a probationer who willfully fails to report to his probation officer even though he may have remained within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court. Hence, the state need not prove that the probationer left the court’s territorial jurisdiction in order to toll the running of his probation period pursuant to R.C. 2951.07.

A trial court retains jurisdiction over a defendant placed on probation in accordance with R.C. 2951.07, which provides:

“Probation under section 2951.02 of the Revised Code continues for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lessee of Allen v. Orris ParishOhio Supreme Court · 1827
  2. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Rue (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. CalhounOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Rash v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. WashingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. MeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API