Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Jenkins

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Replevin by Darwin W. Sherman against Lyman Jenkins. From a judgment for plaintiff,' defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHerrick, J.

The assignment to the defendant, on its face, was a valid assignment, The burden, therefore, was on the plaintiff to prove that it was invalid for reasons outside of the record. Hooper v. Baillie, 118 N. Y. 413, 23 N. E. Rep. 569. I have been unable to find anything in the evidence in the case proving, or tending to prove, that the member of the copartnership who signed the instrument of assignment was not authorized to do so by his copartner, as set forth in the acknowledgment. The defendant would therefore lawfully become possessed of all the copartnership property. The olamtiff’s assignor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cutler v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Hooper v. . BaillieNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martine v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API