Legal Opinion

Josephson v. Danziger

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1932No. 2202PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT

Various errors are assigned in the petition in error and urged by counsel for plaintiff in error in their brief.

We have read the record in this case and considered the briefs which have been filed by counsel. The brief of counsel for plaintiff in error contains citations and references to the various portions of the evidence which plaintiff in error claims was improperly submitted to the jury.

In view of these citations of the evidence complained of, it will be unnecessary for us to quote the same in detail.

Objection is particularly made to the introduction of certain testimony…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davish v. ArnOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Parks v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API