Crockard v. Publishers, Saturday Evening Post Magazine of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. The reasons advanced are that the complaint, as amended, does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and lack of jurisdiction of the Court over the subject matter set forth in the complaint. I shall consider the issues in that order.
The plaintiff in this action is presently incarcerated at Jackson, Michigan^ The complaint, which was drawn by the plaintiff himself, alleges that on June 18, 1953, the defendant entered into a conspiracy to publish untrue statements respecting the sanity of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Burt v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Kelleam v. Maryland Casualty Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Solich v. WheelingDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982