United States v. Certain Parcels of Land
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a Rule to Show Cause why the McCradyRodgers Company should not 'be permitted to become a party defendant and secure certain relief in the way of additional compensation and damages as a subsequent title holder to property condemned by the United States.
Pursuant to the request of the Commissioner of the Federal Public Housing Authority, based on findings of the President of the United States that an acute shortage of housing existed in the area or locality in and about the Township of Potter, County of Beaver, Commonwealth of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ludecke v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. LanzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962