Legal Opinion

Cain v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1999No. Docket No. 211416Published

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, P.J.

Appellant Chiamp and Associates, P.C. (the Chiamp firm) appeals by leave granted from the Court of Claims’ order denying its motion to withdraw from representing intervening plaintiffs. MCR 2.117(C)(2).

The order before us represents only the most recent of the Chiamp firm’s ongoing efforts to extricate itself from a lawsuit initiated by its former associate, Charlene Snow. There have been two motions to withdraw from representing the intervening plaintiffs, and three hearings, regarding the question *423whether continued representation would result in an unreasonable financial burden to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cain v Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bond v. Ann Arbor School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  4. Grigg v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Kriegsman v. KriegsmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API