Stuckey v. Lindley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court; Frederick D. Fulkerson, Judge; statement by the court. Appellee instituted this action before a justice of the peace by filing his affidavit that Charles Hunter was indebted to him in the sum of $67.70 for some walnut logs sold by appellee to Hunter, and that the purchase money therefor was due and unpaid, and a-slcing judgment for said sum, and that it be declared a lien on the said logs, and at the same time gave a bond to procure the…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court; Frederick D. Fulkerson, Judge; statement by the court. Appellee instituted this action before a justice of the peace by filing his affidavit that Charles Hunter was indebted to him in the sum of $67.70 for some walnut logs sold by appellee to Hunter, and that the purchase money therefor was due and unpaid, and a-slcing judgment for said sum, and that it be declared a lien on the said logs, and at the same time gave a bond to procure the issuance of the order .of seizure. Appellee also filed an itemized statement of an account with Hunter, which showed a…
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts.) Appellant does not question the correctness of the amount of the judgment, but claims that the court erred in declaring a lien on the walnut logs attached. This only affects the intervener,' and his rights ■ are not before the court.
Appellant does not claim any interest in the logs, and was not prejudiced by the declaration of law, if erroneous. Kelly v. Keith, 77 Ark. 31.
He could only be affected by the trivial amount of costs that accrued by reason of the attachment, and that could have been reached by motion to retax the costs, instead of by appeal.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kelly v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Booker v. BlytheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Lewis v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920