Legal Opinion

Child v. New York Times Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided May 27, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action at Law to Recover the Statutory Penalty for Infringement of a Copyright for a Photograph.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This action is brought against the New York Times Company to recover a penalty under the provisions of section 4965, Rev. St., amended by the act of 1895 (2 Supp. Rev. St. p. 437), for infringement of a copyrighted photograph. The plaintiff seeks to recover, pursuant to that section, the sum of’ one dollar for a number of copies-of the New York Times purchased by him containing the alleged infringing photograph. The copies of the paper produced upon the trial, and therefore the sole evi*528dence upon which the judgment rests, were not seized for purposes of forfeiture and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ohman v. City of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
  2. Stern v. RemickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API