Legal Opinion

Barton v. Simmons

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBKEDE, J.

Defendant admits entering into an oral agreement with plaintiff for the purchase of her real and personal property and the deposit of the certificate of stock with the bank as.a guaranty of his promise to pay $2,500 on the purchase price, as shown by the -written agreement of deposit. By the terms of that agreement, plaintiff became at the very instant it was made, vested with a special property as the certificate could only be divested by defendant paying $2,500 to the bank on the fifteenth day of June, 1927. The defendant interposes but one defense, the statute of frauds. He says that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bennett v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Van Shaack v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  3. Kearney v. VaughanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  4. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. BraillardWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Martin v. . CowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Golden v. GoldenOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lanham v. ReimannOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Arnold v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API