Legal Opinion

Sisson v. Barrett

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1849PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion for judgment upon a special verdict. The action was assumpsit. The plaintiff declared upon the money counts, and gave notice that he would give in evidence a note upon which he had paid moneys as surety for the defendant, viz. the sum of §1122,50 and interest from the 1st day of October, 1847. The note was as follows: 11 §2000. For value received, we jointly and-severally promise to pay Wm.

Read the full summary

Motion for judgment upon a special verdict. The action was assumpsit. The plaintiff declared upon the money counts, and gave notice that he would give in evidence a note upon which he had paid moneys as surety for the defendant, viz. the sum of §1122,50 and interest from the 1st day of October, 1847. The note was as follows: 11 §2000. For value received, we jointly and-severally promise to pay Wm. Davis, his heirs or assigns, two thousand dollars one year from date at seven per cent interest. Poughkeepsie, January, 1st, 1842. E. L. Barrett. O. D. Barrett. Jacob Sisson, Surety.” The defendant…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Barculo, J.

The note was made for the benefit of Edward L. Barrett the first signer. The jury have found, by the special verdict, that Caleb D. Barrett was a surety for Edward L. Barrett. Sisson, the third signer, added to his signature the word “ surety.” There is nothing else to show the understanding of the parties, or the circumstances under which their respective signatures were made. The single question then arises, upon this state of facts, whether the legal effect of the word “ surety,” added to the plaintiff’s name, constitutes him a surety, as to both of the previous…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. WarnerNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Warner v. PriceNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCarty v. PepperIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Bowser v. RendellIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Paulin v. KaighnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1859
  4. In re Estate of KellerPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Schuylkill County · 1873
  5. In re WilliamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API