Legal Opinion

Young v. Hirsch

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1938No. 12294PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kussell, Chief Justice.

1. The first count of the petition stated a cause of action for the relief sought, on the theory of a mutual mistake of fact. “In all cases of a mistake of fact material to the contract or other matter affected by it, if the party complaining applies within a reasonable time, equity will relieve.” Code, § 37-206. “The negligence of the complaining party, preventing relief in equity, is that want of reasonable prudence the absence of which would be a violation of legal duty. Belief may be granted even in cases of negligence by the complainant, if it appears that the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. J. Kuniansky Inc. v. WareSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Decatur Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. Westbrook v. BeusseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. Lanning v. SockwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API