Securities & Exchange Commission v. College Bound, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on plaintiffs motion for an order requiring the Ron-Mns to execute consent directives and to confirm their compliance with this court’s April 28, 1992 order (“Plf.’s Mot.”). After *2consideration of the filings of both parties and the relevant law, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs aforementioned motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part for the reasons set forth below.
I. Introduction
On April 28, 1992, Judge Charles R. Rich-ey entered an order freezing the assets of the Ronkins and ordered repatriation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Doe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re N.D.N.Y. Grand Jury Subpoena 86-0351-S. United States of America v. A Grand Jury WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bregman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Rigby v. Mastro (In Re Mastro)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018