Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Amalgamated Local Union No. 355

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 26, 1962No. 61-C-904PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISHLER, District Judge.

Motion by plaintiff to strike out affirmative defense pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., i. e., that the affirmative defense is insufficient in law or immaterial, impertinent or redundant.

This action is brought by the Secretary of Labor against defendant local labor organization, pursuant to Section 402(b) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA), 73 Stat. 534, 29 U.S.C.A. § 482(b).1 The claim states that there is probable cause to believe that in violation of Sections 401(b) and 401(e) of the LMRDA2…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. BerryDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1987
  2. Meinrath v. Singer Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  3. Sun Insurance Co. of New York v. Diversified Engineers, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1965
  4. Wirtz v. Local Union No. 125, International Hod Carriers', Building & Common Laborers' UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
  5. Hodgson v. Union de Empleados de los Supermercados PuebloDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API